Blue World City Islamabad was an ambitious project that aimed to be a model for sustainable living. Unfortunately, the project has now been cancelled after it was found that the plans did not adhere to city regulations. The idea behind Blue World City was to create a self-sufficient city made up entirely of blue-colored buildings. But when officials from NOC (the National Offshore Company) inspected the project, they found that it did not follow all the necessary guidelines. As a result, Blue World City has now been cancelled and its residents will have to find new homes. While this news may be discouraging, it is important to remember that these kinds of projects are always subject to change. If you are planning something similar, make sure to check with your local officials first to make sure everything is in line.
The Blue World City NOC was cancelled due to rising operational costs
Earlier this year, the blue world city NOC was cancelled due to rising operational costs. The decision came as a shock to many people, as blue world city Islamabad had seemingly been making great progress in its development over the past few years.
The primary reason for the cancellation is believed to be the high costs of running the NOC. According to reports, it cost around $2 million annually to operate the NOC, which was significantly higher than other similar projects. It is thought that this cost was contributing to the overall decline in attendance at events held within the city.
It is unclear what will happen now that blue world city has been cancelled. However, it is likely that some of the project’s key aspects – such as its planned theme park – will not be realised. This could have a significant impact on both the city itself and on the wider industry associated with virtual reality.
Other NOCs in India are continuing to operate despite the challenges
Other NOCs in India are continuing to operate despite the challenges. Delhi’s regulator, the Airports Authority of India (AAI), cancelled the blue world city NOC in October 2018, citing a number of concerns including environmental degradation and unauthorised construction. However, other airports like Hyderabad Airport and Bengaluru International Airport continue to operate with their respective NOCs.
The cancellation of the blue world city NOC came as a surprise to many who had been expecting it to be granted given its status as one of India’s most prestigious airports. The airport was expected to help revitalise Delhi’s economy, but it appears that this has not been the case. A study commissioned by AAI found that only 5% of passengers arriving at blue world city used public transport, compared with 40% at Delhi’s main airport.
Despite these disappointing results, other airports are continuing to operate. Hyderabad Airport is home to the Airbus manufacturing plant and is growing rapidly; while Bengaluru International Airport is one of India’s busiest airports and is expected to play a significant role in the country’s aviation sector. It remains to be seen whether or not blue world city will be able to return after its cancellation and find a new purposeful operator.
The future of city planning
The world’s first blue city, NOC, was initially envisioned as the future of urban planning. But after six years of development, the proposal was cancelled due to financial constraints. What went wrong with this ambitious project?
NOC was proposed in 2009 by Danish architect Bjarke Ingels and his firm BIG. The city would be made up of a series of interconnected islands connected by a network of bridges and highways. The islands would be surrounded by a water body, providing residents with an abundance of fresh air and waterfront access.
The idea behind NOC was to create an environmentally friendly city that would reduce energy consumption and reliance on fossil fuels. The plan also called for the development of new urban typologies that could be adapted to different climates and environments around the world.
Despite its innovative design, NOC faced several challenges from the beginning.financial constraints prevented the project from moving forward, and opposition from nearby communities led to delays in approvals. In addition, many observers doubted whether blue cities could actually achieve widespread adoption given their high costs and limited environmental benefits.
Ultimately, NOC was cancelled due to economic factors more than anything else. Ironically enough, despite its many flaws, NOC may have been more successful if it had been implemented as a Pilot Project rather than an overall vision for the future of urban planning.”
Background
Background
Blue World City was an ambitious, global city blueprint that was to be built on the ruins of NOC, an abandoned city in the Middle East. The project was cancelled in September 2017 after years of development and campaigning by urban planning activist group City-Lab.
The reasons for the cancellation are still contested, but some key points include: financial instability, slow development progress, and community opposition. Despite these setbacks, Blue World City’s vision represents an important conversation about how cities should work in the 21st century.
Decision-Making Process
The decision to cancel blue world city came as a surprise to many, especially given that the project had already received funding from several sources. In a statement released on their website, the NOC revealed that they had cancelled the project “due to numerous unforeseen circumstances.” One of these circumstances was apparently the financial crisis in China, which made it difficult for the city to attract investors.
Some have questioned why the NOC didn’t contact the city’s planners earlier about these difficulties. The NOC insists that they did try to reach out, but were unable to do so due to “communication issues.” Others have pointed out that it is possible that blue world city would not have been able to succeed regardless of the Chinese financial crisis- after all, this was only one of several planned cities slated for development in China.
In any case, blue world city will be missed. It was an ambitious project and it will be interesting to see what other urban planning projects make their way into fruition in the near future.
Reasons for Cancellation
The city of blue was always meant to be a utopia. The citizens were supposed to be happy, healthy, and vibrant. But something went wrong. The city was canceled due to numerous reasons. Here are some of the main ones:
1) Poor planning: From the very beginning, it was clear that the city had been Planned poorly. The streets weren’t wide enough to accommodate all of the cars and there weren’t enough parks or businesses for people to visit.
2) Lack of funding: Money was always an issue for blue world city. No one knew how much money it would take to build the city, let alone keep it running.
3) Conflict between residents: From the beginning, there have been clashes between the residents of blue world city and the planners who created the city. These conflicts have caused a lot of problems, including pollution and crime rates that are far higher than normal cities have.
Conclusion
Blue World City was to be the world’s first sustainable and carbon neutral city. The project was to include a number of environmentally friendly features, such as high-efficiency lighting, rainwater harvesting and food production in urban areas. However, due to several financial setbacks the project has now been cancelled. What went wrong with Blue World City?
